[Dr. Aaron Lerner - IMRA: Read this line: "Iran’s nuclear program worries
American allies in the region and beyond, according to the strategy. Iran
sponsors terrorist groups in the region and is active in Syria, Iraq, Yemen
and Lebanon."
Wait a minute - the USA isn't worried? Just "American allies in the region
and beyond"]

Dempsey Releases National Military Strategy
By Jim Garamone
DoD News, Defense Media Activity
http://www.defense.gov/news/newsarticle.aspx?id=129191

WASHINGTON, July 1, 2015 – The chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff cannot
predict exactly where the next threat to the United States and its interests
may come from, but he knows it will happen faster than in the past and the
U.S. military must be prepared.

The National Military Strategy released today by Army Gen. Martin E. Dempsey
provides the blueprint for how the military will use its forces to protect
and advance U.S. national and security interests.

“Globalization, diffusion of technology, and demographic shifts are driving
rapid change as state actors and trans-regional networks challenge order and
stability,” said Dempsey. “This strategy addresses these dynamics and our
strategy to ensure that our force remains the best-led, trained and equipped
military on the planet.”

The National Military Strategy follows the release of the 2015 National
Security Strategy in February this year, as well as the 2014 Quadrennial
Defense Review.

Strategic Outlook

The strategy recognizes that the application of military power versus
traditional state threats is far different than military power against
non-state actors. It also posits that the most likely scenario is prolonged
campaigns rather than short, intense battles.

The strategy also states that as a “hedge against unpredictability with
reduced resources we may have to adjust our global posture.”

According to the strategy document, the U.S. military also must be ready to
counter “revisionist states” such as Russia that are challenging
international norms as well as violent extremist organizations such as the
Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant.

“We are working with allies to deter, deny and -- when necessary -- defeat
potential state adversaries,” the document says. But at the same time, the
U.S. military is building and leading an extensive network to take on ISIL.

Globalization Complicates Security Strategy

Globalization is allowing people and technology to move around the world in
a way never seen before, complicating an already complex security situation,
according to the strategy. Globalization has positive effects in stimulating
trade and making many nations prosperous, but it also can exacerbate social
tensions, cause competition for resources and may engender political
instability.

Technology speeds everything up. The strategy noted that individuals and
groups, today, have more information at their beck and call than governments
had in the past.

Concerns About Russia, Iran, North Korea

While the document notes Russia’s contributions in some security areas such
as counternarcotics and counterterrorism, it also points to that nation’s
willingness to use force to achieve its goals.

“It also has repeatedly demonstrated that it does not respect the
sovereignty of its neighbors,” the strategy states. “Russia’s military
actions are undermining regional security directly and through proxy
forces.”

But Russia is not the only country of concern in the strategy document.

Iran’s nuclear program worries American allies in the region and beyond,
according to the strategy. Iran sponsors terrorist groups in the region and
is active in Syria, Iraq, Yemen and Lebanon.

North Korea remains an outlaw state that has developed atomic weapons and is
building missiles capable of reaching the United States.

China a Question Mark

China is in a different class, but could be a threat to the United States,
according to the strategy. It is a rising great power and the strategy
encourages China “to become a partner for greater international security.”

Still, Chinese actions in the South China Sea are worrisome.

It is a complex strategic environment and the U.S. military cannot focus on
one threat to the exclusion of all others, according to the strategy.

“[The U.S. military] must provide a full range of military options for
addressing both revisionist states and [violent extremist organizations],”
the strategy says. “Failure to do so will result in greater risk to our
nation and the international order.”