About Us

IMRA
IMRA
IMRA

 

Subscribe

Search


...................................................................................................................................................


Friday, September 23, 2016
Israel's F-35s among those with insulation failure

F-35 Insulation Failure: Status and Questions
(Source: compiled by Defense-Aerospace.com; posted Sept 22, 2016)
http://www.defense-aerospace.com/articles-view/feature/5/177218/the-f_35-insulation-failure%3A-status-and-review.html

PARIS --- A week after the US Air Force grounded 15 F-35A fighters, very
little additional information has been released about the circumstances and
background of this, the latest incident in the troubled program’s long
history of technical problems.

Characteristically, the message from US Air Force leaders was to shrug off
as inevitable, if not desirable, the technical faults that are being
discovered on delivered aircraft. Lt Gen Christopher Bogdan, F-35 Program
Executive Officer, said. “The mark of a good program is not that you don’t
have any problems, but that you find things early, you fix them, you make
the airplane better, you make the weapons system better, and you move on,”
he said.

Left unsaid is that 2016 marks the F-35’s fifteenth year of development,
which hardly qualifies as “early,” but that is just one more sign showing
how far the program has become detached from reality.

“Now is the time to find this and fix them,” Bogdan added. If such problems
had not been found today, “but three or four years from now, we [would have
had] hundreds of airplanes out there affected.”

Also upbeat, Major General Morten Klever, director of the Norwegian F-35
Program Office, noted Sept 16 that “What is positive in this is that this
shows that the maintenance routines in place for the aircraft have worked….
We expect this to be resolved by the time we receive the next aircraft
currently in production,” due in early 2017.

Only pilots, maintainers qualified to discuss F-35

Possibly embarrassed by the fact that the grounding happened just six weeks
after the Air Force, with much fanfare, declared the aircraft’s Initial
Operational Capability (IOC), Air Force generals have made extraordinary
statements about criticism of the troubled program.

“I’m hopeful that …. we all take the opportunity to form opinions on this
airplane from experts, and the only experts in the F-35 business are those
that fix, maintain and fly the F-35 on a day-to-day basis,” Brig. Gen. Scott
Pleus, director of the Air Force F-35 Integration Office, told the Air Force
Association Air, Space and Cyber conference in National Harbor, Md. “If you
are forming your opinions by somebody who has not fixed or flown the
airplane, I would tell you you’re wrong.”

In a sweeping indictment of program skeptics, Pleus added that “Critics are
wrong, and I’m here to tell you that this aircraft is performing very well
and getting better each and every day.” As usual, no data was provided to
back up this claim, which is routinely disproved by events.

This unfocused attack on the credibility of “critics” of the program was
also taken up by Gen. Herbert “Hawk” Carlisle, chief of Air Combat Command,
who complained there are people “who will make comments, but will never
actually have to do anything.”

He and Pleus probably overlooked the fact that, if the F-35 was on schedule,
on budget and living up to its hyperbolic billing, critics wouldn’t have a
leg to stand on and could be dismissed off-hand. Given the program’s real
situation, however, it is remarks such as these that show the program, and
senior Pentagon leaders involved in the program, require adult supervision.

We have selected below a series of excerpts from a range of media outlets in
an attempt to clarify the underlying issues and the way forward. Links to
all sources are provided at bottom.

Remarkably, the US Air Force, which throughout August issued many press
releases and statements celebrating the F-35A’s Initial Operating
Capability, has not issued a single one about this latest grounding. The
only official comments so far have been made by officials speaking at the
AFA conference.

What we know about the fuel line incident

-- "peeling and crumbling" insulation was discovered inside avionics cooling
lines in some A-model fuel tanks, which are used as heat sinks.

-- Lockheed says the “non-conforming insulation was found on coolant tubing
carrying Poly-Alpha-Olefin (PAO) throughout the jet’s wings.”

-- The insulation deteriorated when it met fuel and crumbled, clogging the
vent between the wing tank and fuselage tank, but would not affect the
engine’s performance, Lt Gen Chris Bogdan said at the annual Air Force
Association conference Tuesday.

-- The problem was discovered by the Air Force during depot maintenance but
had not been spotted by quality assurance controls.

-- The faulty insulation was supplied by a secondary vendor who was being
integrated into the F-35 supply chain. The two other versions, -B and -C,
are not affected.

-- Major General Morten Klever, the director of the Norwegian F-35 Program
Office, described the problem as being “caused by a supplier using improper
materials and improper sealing techniques for these specific parts.”

-- The Norwegian statement issued Sept 16 adds that “the insulation issue
was discovered during routine depot maintenance of a US aircraft, with
subsequent inspections confirming issues with other aircraft fitted with
cooling lines from the same provider.”

-- The US Air Force has not issued a statement about the incident or the
subsequent grounding, and neither is mentioned on its websites.

-- Neither Lockheed not the USAF have identified the supplier at fault, save
to say it was a second source brought on last year as an insurance measure
for the production ramp up, Bogdan said.

Which aircraft are affected

-- 13 US Air Force and two Norwegian F-35As at Luke Air Force Base have been
grounded. The Norwegian aircraft are the third and fourth, and were
delivered this summer.

-- 42 aircraft on the Lockheed final assembly line at Fort Worth have also
been fitted with the same sub-standard insulation, which must be replaced.
Most of these aircraft are intended for the US Air Force, but also included
are:
-- the first two F-35As for Israel, which were due to be delivered in
December, and several more Israeli aircraft;
- three more Norwegian F-35As, due for delivery in early 2017;
-an unknown number for the Italian air force and the Japan Air Self-Defense
Force.

The fix

-- Bogdan said the program is assessing the risks associated with flying the
aircraft before the fix is made. "We're doing a risk assessment right now to
see if any or all of them, based on the damage we've seen from inspections,
could get back in the air while they're waiting to get fixed," he said. "We
should have the assessment done in the next week or so."

-- The US Air Force is currently working to develop a fix for the problem,
and ACC chief Hawk Carlisle said a solution has not yet been identified.
.
-- Lockheed is expected to test a fix for the problem on a ground-test
aircraft next week, JPO chief Lt Gen Chris Bogdan told reporters.

-- Pending this test, Lockheed has assembled eight teams to begin repairing
the fielded aircraft in the next two weeks. The Air Force expects repairs
will take until December to complete.

-- “Our first priority is the 15 airplanes in the field and then we will
work our way back to resolving the 42 airplanes on the production line,”
Bogdan said. “We will spend most of October and November ‘modding’ those
airplanes and getting them back into a flyable condition and then we will
work on the production airplanes.”

-- The JPO, Lockheed Martin, the Air Force Life Cycle Management Center and
the Naval Air Systems Command “have come up with an engineering solution in
which we will go in by cutting holes in the wings—and there are access
panels we can go through also—and remove that insulation and FOD [foreign
object damage)] and close the airplane up and allow it to get back into
flight,” Bogdan said.

Cost and payment

"To Lockheed's credit, at the highest levels of the corporation they have
committed to doing the right thing and the definition of doing the right
thing is they will pay for all of the engineering and manufacturing and all
of the modification for all 52 airplanes," Bogdan said. "I do not know how
much [the cost] is. They've made that commitment to me."

Unanswered questions

Whatever the details, the basic fact is that Lockheed was evaluating a
prospective new supplier, but did not test its product before installing it
on 57 production aircraft. How could this happen?

This is an extraordinary quality control failure, and all the more so that
the company should have made a major effort to prevent any more incidents
than are inevitable in an aircraft that has racked up an inordinate number
of failures.

Furthermore, the Air Force said it had carried out multiple checks and
inspections in the lead-up to declaring the aircraft’s IOC on August 2, so
not finding this crumbling insulation points to less than perfect controls
on the USAF side, as well.

Given the F-35 program’s record of transparency, it is natural to wonder
whether the truth is not being massaged for public consumption. Significant
questions remain unanswered:

-- when was the problem first identified?
-- when were the grounded aircraft delivered?
-- how many hours had they flown before the crumbling insulation was found?
-- did the USAF declare IOC before or after this problem was first
identified?

Sources
The following reports were used to compile our overview:

U.S. Air Force Defends F-35A, Readies Fix for Grounded Jets
AIN Online, September 21, 2016,

AFA 2016: Pentagon expects F-35 coolant line fix in weeks
IHS Jane's Defence Weekly, September 21, 2016

US Air Force finds F-35 fuel line fix
Flightglobal, September 21, 2016

Air Force to Begin More Repairs on Grounded F-35s
DoD Buzz, September 20, 2016

F-35 JPO assessing risk of flying grounded jets before they're fixed
Inside Defense, September 20, 2016 |

Grounded F-35As may not fly for months
Inside Defense, September 20, 2016 |

Faulty Cooling Lines Identified on Two Norwegian F-35s
Norway Ministry of Defence, Sept 16, 2016

Temporary Suspension of Flight Operations Announced for A Limited Number of
F-35A Aircraft
Lockheed Martin F-35.com; Sept 16, 2016

-ends-

Search For An Article

....................................................................................................

Contact Us

POB 982 Kfar Sava
Tel 972-9-7604719
Fax 972-3-7255730
email:imra@netvision.net.il IMRA is now also on Twitter
http://twitter.com/IMRA_UPDATES

image004.jpg (8687 bytes)