About Us

IMRA
IMRA
IMRA

 

Subscribe

Search


...................................................................................................................................................


Monday, October 1, 2007
ISRAELI COURT CITES SELECTIVE PROSECUTION IN SEDITION ACQUITTAL

ISRAELI COURT CITES SELECTIVE PROSECUTION IN SEDITION ACQUITTAL
Monday, October 01, 2007
www.israeljustice.com/news2.asp?key=86

JERUSALEM -- An Israeli court, citing selective prosecution, has acquitted
three Jewish activists of sedition and incitement against the government.

Jerusalem Magistrates Court Judge Rachel Shalev-Gertal acquitted the
three defendants -- Shai Malka, Ariel Vangrover and Adiel Sharabi -- of
sedition and incitement in connection with their organization of a massive
civil disobedience campaign against the government's plan to expel 16,000
Jews from the Gaza Strip and northern West Bank in August 2005.

"The selective enforcement [of the law] is strange," Shalev-Gertal said
in her decision. "And no satisfactory answer was given as to why the
prosecution chose to indict just these three youths."

Shai Malka, Adiel Sharabi and Ariel Vangrover deemed the leaders of the
National Home [Bayit Leumi] movement, were charged with sedition in
connection with the blocking of Israeli highways on May 16, 2005. The
prosecution said the three defendants, arrested on the eve of the protest,
had planned to halt traffic.

Prosecutor Dan Bahat said the protest campaign was planned solely by the
three defendants -- in contrast to Jewish settlement leaders who sought to
avoid unrest. Bahat said the highway shutdown plan, a method often used by
Israeli labor unions, marked a revolt against the government.

During the two-and-a-half-year trial, the defense had accused the state
of selective prosecution. Members of the state-financed Council of Jewish
Settlements in Judea, Samaria and Gaza -- most of them with high-level
political connections -- organized the largest protests, including an
aborted attempt by 40,000 people to enter the Gaza Strip to stop the
government expulsion.

Throughout the trial, Shalev-Gertal expressed skepticism over the
prosecution claim that the defendants were the sole architects of the
campaign against the Israeli withdrawal from the Gaza Strip and northern
West Bank. Shalev-Gertal cited the months of anti-government protests
attended by hundreds of thousands of people.

In her decision on Sept. 20, Shalev-Gertal said the state avoided
indicting community leaders for organizing protests against the expulsion,
including leaders of the Council of Jewish Settlements in Judea, Samaria and
Gaza [Yesha]. Shalev-Gertal said the activities of the Bayit Leumi were not
significantly different from those of the Yesha leadership.

"They [defendants] are not recognized as a political body and their
influence on the public, even if we give them full credit, is not like that
of public figures or leaders like the Council of Jewish Settlements in
Judea, Samaria and Gaza, rabbis or parliamentarians," Shalev-Gertal said.

The state has 45 days to appeal the decision.

"I'm very pleased with the decision," defense attorney Ido Stouber said.
"Of course, the state will appeal to the district court."

Search For An Article

....................................................................................................

Contact Us

POB 982 Kfar Sava
Tel 972-9-7604719
Fax 972-3-7255730
email:imra@netvision.net.il IMRA is now also on Twitter
http://twitter.com/IMRA_UPDATES

image004.jpg (8687 bytes)