About Us

IMRA
IMRA
IMRA

 

Subscribe

Search


...................................................................................................................................................


Tuesday, January 1, 2008
PM Olmert in JP interview indicates Pal state not for peace or security - but voting rights

[Dr. Aaron Lerner - IMRA:

PM Olmert doesn't even try to insult the intelligence of JP readers by
claiming that creation of a sovereign Palestinian state would bring either
peace or security - just a way to address the question of Palestinian voting
rights.

It wasn't so long ago that Olmert, Peres and Rabin were confident that there
was a viable solution to the challenge of providing the Palestinians with
voting rights without creating a sovereign Palestinian state that could
ultimately destroy Israel: Palestinian autonomy.

What changed?

If anything the need for an alternative to a sovereign Palestinian state is
clearer today than ever before.

So what happened?

In the old days the retreat promoters argued that retreat would bring peace
and security. Now they know that this is a farce the public cannot accept.

So they came up with the voting argument.

And the intellectual midgets accepted the argument and the die was cast.]
======

'Even Israel's good friends see future with J'lem divided'
Herb Keinon and David Horovitz , THE JERUSALEM POST Jan. 1, 2008
www.jpost.com
/servlet/Satellite?cid=1198517258675&pagename=JPost%2FJPArticle%2FShowFull

Israel needs to internalize that even its supportive friends on the
international stage conceive of the country's future on the basis of the
1967 borders and with Jerusalem divided, Prime Minister Ehud Olmert has
declared to The Jerusalem Post.

At the same time, he made clear that he did not envisage a permanent accord
along the '67 lines, describing Ma'aleh Adumim as an "indivisible" part of
Jerusalem and Israel.

In an interview at the start of a year that he hopes will yield a permanent
Israeli-Palestinian peace accord, the prime minister said many rival Israeli
political parties remain "detached from the reality" that requires Israel to
compromise "on parts of Eretz Yisrael" in order to maintain its Jewish,
democratic nature.
If Israel "will have to deal with a reality of one state for two peoples,"
he said, this "could bring about the end of the existence of Israel as a
Jewish state. That is a danger one cannot deny; it exists, and is even
realistic."

Indeed, his primary responsibility as prime minister, Olmert said, lay in
ensuring a separation from the Palestinians.

"What will be if we don't want to separate?" he asked rhetorically. "Will we
live eternally in a confused reality where 50 percent of the population or
more are residents but not equal citizens who have the right to vote like
us? My job as prime minister, more than anything else, is to ensure that
doesn't happen."

The reality in which Israel was seeking an accommodation, he elaborated,
includes a situation in which even "the world that is friendly to Israel...
that really supports Israel, when it speaks of the future, it speaks of
Israel in terms of the '67 borders. It speaks of the division of Jerusalem."

What was extraordinary about US President George W. Bush, in this context,
Olmert said, was that Bush, since a landmark letter he wrote to then-prime
minister Ariel Sharon in 2004, has made plain that he envisages Israel
maintaining at least some territory in Judea and Samaria. Bush "has already
said '67 plus," said Olmert, "and that's an amazing achievement for Israel."

Thus, Olmert asserted, while the road map obligated Israel to stop all
building in the settlements, including for natural growth, the Bush letter
"renders flexible to a degree the significance of what is written in the
road map."

In comments likely to further exacerbate Palestinian protest at ongoing
settlement expansion, Olmert said he considered Ma'aleh Adumim to be "an
indivisible part of Jerusalem and the State of Israel. I don't think when
people are talking about settlements they are talking about Ma'aleh Adumim."

At the same time, the prime minister expressed considerable empathy for
Palestinian concerns over settlement growth. If the only construction work
undertaken since the road map was accepted had been at Ma'aleh Adumim and
Har Homa, he said, "then I imagine the Palestinians, though they might not
have been happy about it, would not have responded in the way that they
respond when every year, all the settlements - in all the territories -
continue to grow. There is a certain contradiction in this between what
we're actually seeing and what we ourselves promised. We always complain
about the [breached] promises of the other side. Obligations are not only to
be demanded of others, but they must also be honored by ourselves."

While all the final-status issues were now on the table as part of the
Annapolis process, Olmert stressed that he would never accept a Palestinian
"right of return" to Israel.

He said he was convinced, too, that Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud
Abbas "has made the choice in his heart" between clinging to the "myth of
the 'right of return'" and the opportunity to establish a Palestinian state
where all Palestinians, refugees included, would live.

"My impression is that he wants peace with Israel, and accepts Israel as
Israel defines itself," Olmert said. "If you ask him to say that he sees
Israel as a Jewish state, he will not say that. But if you ask me whether in
his soul he accepts Israel, as Israel defines itself, I think he does. That
is not insignificant. It is perhaps not enough, but it is not
insignificant."

Asked whether next week's first Bush presidential visit was designed for
Bush to become the godfather of the State of Palestine, Olmert said, "I
don't think he would define a visit like this in those terms... He's coming
as an expression of his friendship. Also, he's coming to give expression to
his support for the diplomatic process."

Bush was not pressuring Israel in any way, Olmert said. "He's not doing a
single thing that I don't agree to," he said. "He doesn't support anything
that I oppose." Rather, Olmert said, both he and the president hoped that
the Annapolis timetable, for an accord in the course of 2008, could be met.
Indeed, said the prime minister, there was currently an almost divinely
ordained constellation of key personalities on the international stage
favorably disposed to Israel, creating comfortable conditions for
negotiations that might never be replicated.

"It's a coincidence that is almost 'the hand of God,'" Olmert said, "that
Bush is president of the United States, that Nicolas Sarkozy is the
president of France, that Angela Merkel is the chancellor of Germany, that
Gordon Brown is the prime minister of England and that the special envoy to
the Middle East is Tony Blair."

The imperative, he said, was to make every effort for progress while this
array of supportive characters remained in place.

"What possible combination," he asked, "could be more comfortable for the
State of Israel?"

Olmert said he believes "with all my heart" that kidnapped IDF soldier Gilad
Schalit is alive and that he was "making every effort" to determine the
situation of captive reservists Eldad Regev and Ehud Goldwasser. He said he
favored re-examining the criteria for Palestinian prisoner releases because
"it may be that there is room for more precise definitions of what
constitutes 'blood on hands.'"

While Olmert said Egypt needed to do more to prevent arms smuggling into
Gaza, he had high praise for President Hosni Mubarak.

"When I even think of how things would be if we were dealing with people
other than Mubarak, well, I pray every day for his well-being and good
health," he said.

Expansive on many issues, Olmert was insistently understated on the
existential threat posed by Iran. Even in the wake of the recent US National
Intelligence Estimate, he said, "The bottom line is that President Bush
hasn't changed his opinion regarding the danger posed by Iran. And I haven't
changed my impression regarding President Bush's commitment to prevent Iran
from attaining nuclear weapons."

But, he added: "Israel always acted and prepared for the possibility that it
would need to defend its existence on its own. That's always been the case
and that is the case today, wherever a threat to our existence can arise.
Those who need to know do know that we have the tools to defend ourselves."

The full interview with the prime minister will appear in Friday's Jerusalem
Post.

Search For An Article

....................................................................................................

Contact Us

POB 982 Kfar Sava
Tel 972-9-7604719
Fax 972-3-7255730
email:imra@netvision.net.il IMRA is now also on Twitter
http://twitter.com/IMRA_UPDATES

image004.jpg (8687 bytes)