“Precision-guided munitions are quite expensive, and there aren’t a
tremendous number of production lines, so it’s not just a matter of have
they allocated the money for it. It’s a question of how fast can the
production lines ramp up,” she said.

NATO Allies Might Be Unprepared for Syria
Defense News Dec. 17, 2012 - 09:53AM | By ZACHARY FRYER-BIGGS
http://www.defensenews.com/article/20121217/DEFREG01/312170002/NATO-Allies-Might-Unprepared-Syria

As NATO allies move troops and Patriot missile batteries into Turkey,
heating up an already dicey situation on the Syrian border, experts are
pointing to an alarming possibility: Most NATO countries might be
ill-equipped to intervene in the ongoing conflict in Syria.

The problem stems from allies’ relatively small stockpiles of
precision-guided munitions (PGMs), the smart bombs critical to effective
operations in densely populated areas. So even if NATO members voice full
support for an operation, they might not have the weapons to back it up.

“The heart is willing, but the flesh is weak,” said a former U.S. State
Department official.

Potentially making matters worse, experts anticipate that any operation in
Syria would require more PGMs than the last major NATO air campaign in
Libya.

Because of Syria’s superior air defense network and greater population
density, the demand would outstrip supply, said Guy Ben-Ari, a senior fellow
at the Center for Strategic and International Studies.

“They just don’t have enough precision munitions, full stop,” he said.
“Whether it’s to take out the air defense system, or whether it’s to take
out the high-value targets that are much closer in Syria than they were in
Libya to civilian populations, you do need a much larger inventory of
precision munitions.”

Concern over the stockpiles of precision weapons is not theoretical. Less
than a month into the 2011 Libya campaign, NATO came close to running out of
PGMs, which are both advanced and expensive bombs. The situation became
sufficiently dire that the U.S. rushed munitions to allies to help feed the
campaign, and even kept aircraft on call in case NATO allies needed
assistance after the U.S. had ceded major operational control. At the time,
six countries were providing aircraft for the campaign: Belgium, Canada,
Denmark, France, Norway and the U.K.

Experts’ fears about European stocks stem from larger concerns about budgets
in Europe and the Libya scare, which revealed the vital role PGMs play in a
modern campaign, as well as the relatively light reserves carried by many
European countries.

“The budgets have been going down sharply in Europe for over a decade now;
initially, the investment accounts, especially the acquisition accounts,
were quite well-protected, but that hasn’t been the case in the last few
years,” Ben-Ari said. “There really is a big question mark on whether the
PGM inventory specifically has even been brought back to pre-Libya levels,
let alone overstocked for a potential Syria campaign.”

Yet several defense officials from NATO countries voiced confidence in their
stocks of PGMs.

A senior Italian defense source said the Italian Air Force is “satisfied
with its stocks of precision munitions, although not in reference to any
specific mission.” A French defense official said that if there were an
intervention, it would be in a coalition, and there would be sufficient
stockpiles in the coalition. The official would not give numbers but
indicated that France has “enough” bombs or could acquire them through its
allies.

However, on Dec. 14, the French news website lepoint.fr reported France’s
stocks will not return to pre-Libya levels until the end of 2013, citing a
report from the Defense Ministry’s inspector general. A Defense Ministry
spokesman declined to comment on the levels of munitions and the time for
rebuilding stocks but pointed out that it takes about six months for an
order contract to be signed, including the tender process, and the
manufacturing time for sophisticated munitions takes months, not weeks.

The actual level of stocks is “highly classified,” the spokesman said.

The U.K.’s Defence Ministry declined to comment.

Doug Barrie, the senior air analyst at the International Institute of
Strategic Studies in London, said that as part of a broader coalition, the
British are capable of mounting a significant effort with available weapons.

“Six months is doable, but a sustained operation might cause problems,” he
said. “As always, though, time scales are dependent on utilizations and
targets.”

Several European NATO countries have made purchases to restock. The U.K.
placed orders for Raytheon’s Paveway IV precision-guided bomb and MBDA’s
Dual Mode Brimstone missile. An industry source said that following the
Libya campaign, France had ordered a number of guided bombs to replace spent
munitions.

There also is some confidence that there may be some additional capacity
available, if need be. A spokesman for MBDA said production work converting
the legacy Brimstone missile already in British stockpiles into the highly
regarded dual-mode weapon is underway.

If the stocks prove insufficient, the U.S. would have two options: Take over
more of the operations, or send more munitions. Both would be more difficult
this time around, as the U.S. defense budget is stretched far thinner
heading into 2013.

European budgetary concerns become especially significant because of the
expense of PGMs, said Nora Bensahel, a senior fellow at the Center for a New
American Security.

“Precision-guided munitions are quite expensive, and there aren’t a
tremendous number of production lines, so it’s not just a matter of have
they allocated the money for it. It’s a question of how fast can the
production lines ramp up,” she said.

Andrew Chuter in London, Tom Kington in Rome and Pierre Tran in Paris
contributed to this report.