Palestinian pollster to IMRA: Palestinians do not think Israelis want to
Dr. Aaron Lerner - IMRA 26 December 2012
Dear Walid Ladadweh, Palestinian Center for Policy and Survey Research
Following up on our telephone conversation today regarding
PSR - Survey Research Unit: Joint Palestinian Israeli Press release
The poll of Israelis gave them the option to reply that that the Palestinian
aspirations in the long run are to conquer the State of Israel and destroy
much of the Jewish population in Israel.
In contrast, the worse outcome the poll of Palestinians offered was for
Israel to extend its borders to cover all the area between the Jordan River
and the Mediterranean Sea and expel its Arab citizens.
I was wondering why the poll of Palestinians did not give them the option to
reply that the goal of Israel is to extend its borders to cover all the area
between the Jordan River and the Mediterranean Sea and destroy much of the
I would like to share your reply with our readers.
Dr. Aaron Lerner www.imra.org.il
From: Waleed Ladadweh
Sent: Wednesday, December 26, 2012 1:02 PM
To: Dr. Aaron Lerner
Subject: Re: Question about the most recent poll
For several years we ask open questions the Palestinians and the Israelis
for their perceptions of the other party's ambition, and thus depending on
the answers in the open questions we have formulated these questions and
options for both Palestinians and Israelis based on their answers in open
PSR - Survey Research Unit: Joint Palestinian Israeli Press release
26 December 2012
Joint Israeli Palestinian Poll, December 2012
Given the outcome of the Israeli operation in Gaza and the UN recognition of
a Palestinian state, Palestinians move towards Hamas’ over Abbas’s way,
whereas Israelis stand steadfast in their evaluations and preferences.
These are the results of the most recent poll conducted jointly by the Harry
S. Truman Research Institute for the Advancement of Peace at the Hebrew
University of Jerusalem and the Palestinian Center for Policy and Survey
Research in Ramallah. This joint survey was conducted with the support of
the Ford Foundation Cairo office and the Konrad Adenauer Stiftung in
Ramallah and Jerusalem.
Given the UN recognition of a Palestinian state and the outcome of the war
between Hamas and Israel, which is seen by over 80% as a victory of Hamas,
60% of Palestinians prefer Hamas’ way over Abbas’s way (28%) to end the
Israeli occupation and build a Palestinian state. Correspondingly, there is
an increase of 11 percentage points in the choice of armed attack as the
best option to force Israel to withdraw from the territories and a 7 point
decline in the choice of peaceful non-violent resistance compared to a year
ago. Compared to three months ago, there is a 7 and 8 percentage point
increase in vote intention for Hamas and Haniyeh in legislative and
presidential elections, and Haniyeh wins a presidential election if it were
to take place now.
Israeli views of the conflict with the Palestinians are quite sturdy and
complex. Their opinions with regard to Israeli options vis a vis the Hamas
regime and the shelling from Gaza are the same now, following operation
“Pillar of Defense”, as they were following operation “Cast Lead” in 2009.
The most popular strategy (40%) is for Israel to carry out ad-hoc operations
against the shelling and get out. A majority of 54% believes that Israel can
overthrow the Hamas regime, yet a similar majority of 55% supports the
cease-fire with Hamas, and 51% support negotiations with the Hamas
government if needed in order to reach a compromise agreement with the
Palestinians. And 65% of Israelis consider it impossible to reach these days
a final status settlement with the Palestinians, as do the Palestinians
The Palestinian sample size was 1270 adults interviewed face-to-face in the
West Bank, East Jerusalem and Gaza Strip in 127 randomly selected locations
between December 13 and 15, 2012. The margin of error is 3%. The Israeli
sample includes 600 adult Israelis interviewed by phone in Hebrew, Arabic or
Russian between December 9 and 13, 2012. The margin of error is 4.5%. The
poll was planned and supervised by Prof. Yaacov Shamir, the Harry S. Truman
Research Institute for the Advancement of Peace and the Department of
Communication and Journalism at the Hebrew University, and Prof. Khalil
Shikaki, Director of the Palestinian Center for Policy and Survey Research
For further details on the Palestinian survey contact PSR director, Prof.
Khalil Shikaki or Walid Ladadweh, at tel. 02-2964933 or email
email@example.com. On the Israeli survey, contact Prof Yaacov Shamir at tel.
03-6419429 or email firstname.lastname@example.org.
(A) Reactions to the Israeli operation in Gaza and the recognition by the UN
of the Palestinian state as a non-member state
81% of the Palestinians think that Hamas came out the winner from the latest
round of conflict between Israel and Hamas. Israelis are divided in their
assessment: most – 42% - think that neither side came out the winner, 26%
think Israel won, 20% think Hamas won and 10% say that both sides won.
In their assessment of whom the cease fire agreement between Hamas and
Israel serves better, the two publics coincide. The modal category is that
it serves better are the interests of the Palestinians (41% of the
Palestinians and 42% of Israelis). A close 39% and 36% respectively say that
both sides benefit. Only a minority on both sides think that Israel benefits
more (16% of Palestinians and 13% of Israelis.
55% of Israelis support the cease fire with Hamas; 41% oppose it.
When we ask Israelis how Israel should respond if the shelling of Israeli
communities from Gaza resumes, 40 % think that Israel should carry out
ad-hoc operations against the shelling and get out; 25% suggest that Israel
should reoccupy the Gaza Strip and stay there; 28% believe that Israel
should use primarily diplomatic rather than military steps. Following the
Israeli “Cast Lead operation in Gaza in 2009, the corresponding figures were
quite similar: 38%, 30%, and 28%.
41% of the Israelis believe that Israel cannot overthrow the Hamas regime in
Gaza while 54% believe it can – very similar results to those obtained in
March 2009, following operation Cast Lead, when 43% of the Israelis believed
that Israel cannot overthrow the Hamas regime in Gaza while 55% believed it
43% of Palestinians expect that given the outcome of the latest round of
violence between Israel and Hamas, Israel will not wage a ground offensive
against the Strip in the near future, whereas 52% think that it will.
When Palestinians are asked, given the outcome of the war between Hamas and
Israel and the UN recognition of a Palestinian state, whose way is the best
to end the Israeli occupation and build a Palestinian state: Hamas’ way or
Abbas’s way, 60% say Hamas’ way and 28% Abbas’ way.
Correspondingly, Hamas gains in strength among the Palestinian public. If
new presidential elections were held in the PA, Haniyeh would win with 48%
of the vote of those participating, to Abbas’s 45%. Three months ago, Abbas
received the support of 51% and Haniyeh 40%. The percentage of vote for
Haniyeh is the highest since Hamas’ electoral victory in 2006. In
legislative elections, 35% of those who would participate say they would
vote for Hamas and 36% for Fateh,. These results indicate a sharp increase
in Hamas’ popularity compared to our September results when it stood at 28%;
Fateh’s popularity remained almost unchanged during the same period.
We asked Palestinians how they can force Israel to withdraw from the
territories of the Palestinian state, after the UN recognized the
Palestinian state, and Israelis what they think Palestinians will do. 41% of
Israelis think the Palestinians will resume the Intifada including armed
confrontations, while 26% think they will start non-violent resistance such
as peaceful demonstrations, and 20% think they will return to negotiations
with the Israeli government. Indeed, 41% of the Palestinians think that
armed attacks on army and settlers can force Israel to withdraw from the
territories; while 24% think peaceful non-violent resistance can force
Israelis to withdraw and 30% think that negotiations with Israel can bring
it to withdraw. In response to a similar question in December 2011,
Palestinians were split among these three options: 31% thought peaceful
non-violent resistance can force Israelis to withdraw; 30% thought that
armed attacks on army and settlers and 32% thought that negotiations with
Israel can bring it to withdraw.
32% of Israelis think that after the UN recognized the Palestinian state as
a non-member state, Israel should accept the decision and start negotiations
with the Palestinians about its implementation; 26% think that Israel should
accept the decision but not allow any change on the ground by the
Palestinians; 27% think that Israel should oppose the decision and intensify
the construction in the settlements; 4% think that Israel should annex the
territory, and 6% think that Israel should invade the PA and use force in
order to prevent the establishment of a Palestinian state.
Following the UN recognition of the Palestinian state as a non-state member
and the Israeli operation in Gaza, 61% of the Israelis think that armed
attacks will not stop and the two sides will not return to negotiations,
whereas two thirds of Palestinians think that negotiations will resume with
or without armed confrontation.
(B) Israeli military strike against Iran’s nuclear facilities
· 53% of Israelis support the cooperation between the US and Israel
in bombing Iran’s nuclear facilities, and only 20 % support a strike by
Israel alone without the cooperation of the US; 21 % oppose any strike. The
corresponding figures in our previous polls in September and in June were
very similar, with a slight decline in opposition to any strike: 52%, 18%
and 24% in September , and 51%, 19% and 26% in June correspondingly.
· Most Palestinians to not think that Israel will carry out a
military strike against Iran’s nuclear facilities, if Netanyahu wins the
January elections (55%; 34% think Israel will strike).
(C) Attitudes, perceptions and expectations regarding a permanent settlement
The Clinton parameters for a Palestinian-Israeli permanent settlement were
presented by President Clinton at a meeting with Israeli and Palestinian
officials twelve years ago, on December 23, 2000, following the collapse of
the July 2000 Camp David summit. The Geneva Initiative, along similar lines,
was made public around the end of 2003. These parameters address the most
fundamental issues which underlie the Palestinian-Israeli conflict: (1)
Final borders and territorial exchange; (2) Refugees; (3) Jerusalem; (4) A
demilitarized Palestinian state; (5) Security arrangements; and (6) End of
conflict. We address these issues regularly since December 2003, and in the
current poll we revisited these crucial issues, amidst a turbulent Middle
East and the recent political and diplomatic developments in the UN, the
Gaza Strip, the Palestinian Authority and Israel.
56% of Israelis and 43% of Palestinians support a permanent settlement
package along the Clinton parameters. The results indicate a significant
decrease in support for the Clinton / Geneva permanent settlement package
among Palestinians and a slight decline among Israelis compared to December
2011, when 58% among Israelis and 50% among Palestinians supported this
Since 2003, we observed only once majority support for such a settlement on
both sides: in December 2004, shortly after the death of Arafat. The level
of support then was 64% among Israelis and 54% among Palestinians. In 2011
the results came close, where among Israelis there was 58% support, and
among Palestinians – 50% to 49% opposition.
Below we detail support and opposition to the individual items in the
Clinton / Geneva permanent status package.
(1) Final Borders and Territorial Exchange
Among Palestinians 53% support or strongly support and 45% oppose or
strongly oppose an Israeli withdrawal from the West Bank and the Gaza Strip
with the exception of some settlement areas in less than 3% of the West Bank
that would be swapped with an equal amount of territory from Israel in
accordance with a map that was presented to the Palestinian respondents. The
map was identical to that presented to respondents in December 2011, when
support for this compromise, with its map, stood at 63% and opposition at
Among Israelis 46% support and 49% oppose a Palestinian state in the
entirety of Judea, Samaria and the Gaza Strip except for several large
blocks of settlements in 3% of the West Bank which will be annexed to
Israel. Israel will evacuate all other settlements, and the Palestinians
will receive in return territory of similar size along the Gaza Strip. In
December 2011, 51% of the Israelis supported this component while 44%
Among Palestinians 41% support and 56% oppose a refugee settlement in which
both sides agree that the solution will be based on UN resolutions 194 and
242. The refugees would be given five choices for permanent residency. These
are: the Palestinian state and the Israeli areas transferred to the
Palestinian state in the territorial exchange mentioned above; no
restrictions would be imposed on refugee return to these two areas.
Residency in the other three areas (in host countries, third countries, and
Israel) would be subject to the decision of these states. As a base for its
decision Israel will consider the average number of refugees admitted to
third countries like Australia, Canada, Europe, and others. All refugees
would be entitled to compensation for their “refugeehood” and loss of
property. In December 2011, 45% agreed with an identical compromise while
53% opposed it.
Among Israelis 42% support such an arrangement and 49% oppose it. In
December 2011, 42% supported it and 51% opposed.
In the Palestinian public 29% support and 70% oppose a Jerusalem compromise
in which East Jerusalem would become the capital of the Palestinian state
with Arab neighborhoods coming under Palestinian sovereignty and Jewish
neighborhoods coming under Israeli sovereignty. The Old City (including al
Haram al Sharif) would come under Palestinian sovereignty with the exception
of the Jewish Quarter and the Wailing Wall that would come under Israeli
sovereignty. In December 2011, an identical compromise obtained 40% support
and 59% opposition.
Among Israelis, 38 % agree and 59 % disagree to this arrangement in which
the Arab neighborhoods in Jerusalem including the old city and the Temple
Mount will come under Palestinian sovereignty, the Jewish neighborhoods
including the Jewish quarter and the Wailing Wall will come under Israeli
sovereignty, East Jerusalem will become the capital of the Palestinian state
and West Jerusalem the capital of Israel. In December 2011, similarly, 38%
supported this arrangement and 60% opposed it.
(4) Demilitarized Palestinian State
Among Palestinians 28% support and 71% oppose the establishment of an
independent Palestinian state that would have no army, but would have a
strong security force and would have a multinational force deployed in it to
ensure its security and safety. Israel and Palestine would be committed to
end all forms of violence directed against each other. A similar compromise
received in December 2011, 32% support, and opposition reached 67%.
As in previous polls, this item receives the lowest level of support by
Palestinians -- 1% lower than the Jerusalem item. Unlike the refugees and
Jerusalem components, this issue has not received due attention in public
discourse, as it should, since it may become a major stumbling block in the
efforts to reach a settlement.
Among Israelis 70% support and 26% oppose this arrangement compared to 67%
support and 33% opposition obtained in December 2011.
(5) Security Arrangements
In the Palestinian public 46% support and 53% oppose a compromise whereby
the Palestinian state would have sovereignty over its land, water, and
airspace, but Israel would have the right to use the Palestinian airspace
for training purposes, and would maintain two early warning stations in the
West Bank for 15 years. A multinational force would remain in the
Palestinian state and in its border crossings for an indefinite period of
time. The task of the multinational force would be to monitor the
implementation of the agreement, and to monitor territorial borders and
coast of the Palestinian state including the presence at its international
crossings. In comparison, in December 2011, 50% of the Palestinians
supported this parameter while 49% opposed it.
In the Israeli public 59% support and 35% oppose this arrangement compared
to 63% who supported it and 33% who opposed it in December 2011.
(6) End of Conflict
In the Palestinian public 59% support and 39% oppose a compromise on ending
the conflict that would state that when the permanent status agreement is
fully implemented, it will mean the end of the conflict and no further
claims will be made by either side. The parties will recognize Palestine and
Israel as the homelands of their respective peoples. In December 2011 63%
supported and 35% opposed this item.
In the Israeli public 68% support and 28% oppose this component in the final
status framework. In December 2011, similarly, 70% of the Israelis supported
it while 27% opposed it.
The Whole Package
Among Palestinians 43% support and 56% oppose the whole package combining
the elements as one permanent status settlement. In December 2011, 50%
supported and 49% opposed such a package.
Among Israelis 56% support and 40% oppose all the above features together
taken as one combined package. In December 2011 58% supported and 39%
opposed such a package.
It is important to see that the pattern of support for the overall package
is more than the sum of its parts, suggesting that people’s calculus is
compensatory and trade-offs are considered. Despite strong reservations
regarding some of the components, the overall package always receives
greater support in both publics, where the desirable components and the
chance of reaching a permanent status agreement seem to compensate for the
Despite the actual majority support for the final status package in Israel,
only 33% of the Israelis estimate that a majority in their society supports
this package, while 57% believe that the majority opposes it. These
perceptions tap the normative facet of public opinion and indicate that the
package has not acquired widespread normative legitimacy in the Israeli
public. Among Palestinians, where the majority opposes such a package, 49%
identify this majority, while 42% think that there is majority support for
In terms of mutual perceptions, majorities of both Israelis and Palestinians
think that there is no majority support for this permanent status settlement
package on the other side. 55% of the Israelis think that a majority of
Palestinians opposes such a package, and 56% of the Palestinians think that
a majority of Israelis opposes the package.
Both sides' expectations regarding a final status settlement are grim: 65%
among Israelis and 62% among Palestinians think it is impossible to reach
such a settlement these days.
· As we do periodically in our joint polls, we asked Israelis and
Palestinians about their readiness for a mutual recognition of identity, as
part of a permanent status agreement and after all issues in the conflict
are resolved and a Palestinian State is established. Our current poll shows
that 65% of the Israeli public supports such a mutual recognition and 30%
oppose it. Among Palestinians, 40% support and 59% oppose this step. In
September 2012, 62% of the Israelis supported and 30% opposed this mutual
recognition of identity; among Palestinians, 44% supported and 54% opposed
(D) Conflict management and threat perceptions
· 51% of Israelis support negotiations with the Hamas government if
needed in order to reach a compromise agreement with the Palestinians, 46%
oppose such talks. However 66% think that the majority opinion opposes such
· Among Israelis, 55% are worried and 44% are not worried that they
or their family may be harmed by Arabs in their daily life, in September
2012 the corresponding figures were 51% and 48%. Among Palestinians, 74% are
worried that they or a member of their family could be hurt by Israel in
their daily life or that their land would be confiscated or home demolished;
26% are not worried. Similar results were obtained in our September poll
· The level of threat on both sides regarding the aspirations of the
other side in the long run is very high. 61% of Palestinians think that
Israel’s goals are to extend its borders to cover all the area between the
Jordan River and the Mediterranean Sea and expel its Arab citizens, and 20%
think the goals are to annex the West Bank while denying political rights to
the Palestinians. The modal category among Israelis is that the Palestinian
aspirations in the long run are to conquer the State of Israel and destroy
much of the Jewish population in Israel (42%); 18% think the goals of the
Palestinians are to conquer the State of Israel. Only 12% of the
Palestinians think Israel’s aspirations in the long run are to withdraw from
part of the territories occupied in 1967 after guaranteeing its security,
and 6% think Israel aspires to withdraw from all of the territories occupied
in 1967 after guaranteeing its security. 23% of Israelis think the
aspirations of the Palestinians are to regain all of the territories
conquered in 1967, and 13% think the Palestinians aspire to regain some of
the territories conquered in 1967.
· These mutual perceptions are very much off the mark.
21% of the Israelis say the aspirations of Israel are to withdraw to the
1967 border after guaranteeing Israel’s security; 40% say it is to withdraw
from parts of the territories after guaranteeing Israel’s security; 13% say
it is to annex the West Bank without granting political rights to the
Palestinians living there; and 14% say it is to annex the West Bank and
expel the Palestinians living there.
Among the Palestinians 29% say that the aspirations of the Palestinian
Authority and the PLO are to regain some of the territories conquered in the
1967 war; 33% say it is to regain all the territories conquered in the 1967
war; 21% say it is to conquer the State of Israel and regain control over
the pre 1948 Palestine; and 12% say it is to conquer the State of Israel and
destroy much of the Jewish population in Israel.
This joint survey was conducted with the support of the Ford Foundation
Cairo office and the Konrad Adenauer Stiftung in Ramallah and Jerusalem.