About Us

IMRA
IMRA
IMRA

 

Subscribe

Search


...................................................................................................................................................


Saturday, November 1, 2014
Israel, Gulf States Urge Firm Stance As Deadline Looms on Iran Nuke Talks Regional Rivals Share Angst Over Slimmed Prospects for 'Air Tight' Deal

Israel, Gulf States Urge Firm Stance As Deadline Looms on Iran Nuke Talks
Regional Rivals Share Angst Over Slimmed Prospects for 'Air Tight' Deal
Nov. 1, 2014 - 11:36AM By BARBARA OPALL-ROME and AWAD MUSTAFA
http://www.defensenews.com/article/20141101/DEFREG04/311010017/Israel-Gulf-States-Urge-Firm-Stance-Deadline-Looms-Iran-Nuke-Talks

TEL AVIV AND DUBAI — In the run-up to a Nov. 24 deadline for nuclear talks
with Iran, leaders from Israel and gulf states are separately urging Western
powers to stand firm and demand a deal that derails the regional threat from
Tehran.

Reflecting shared angst over dwindling prospects for such a deal, regional
rivals have publicly warned of the dangers in rushing to conclude a partial
deal.

“Failure to conclude a solid agreement that prevents nuclear proliferation
could have serious consequences, not only in our region, but far beyond,”
said Anwar Gargash, UAE minister of state for foreign affairs.

“We consider it crucial that any future agreement with Iran on the nuclear
file be air tight,” he said.

In Israel, Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has repeatedly expressed the
same thought, only in different words. “No deal is better than a bad deal.”

Privately, Israeli officials are pushing for another six-month extension,
rather than see the talks collapse. But much like the infinitely protracted
talks between Israeli and Palestinian leaders, the extension route reflects
lost hope of reaching an airtight deal.

“Officially, Israel would like to see an extension … but behind that is not
necessarily any hope for a chance of getting a good deal,” said Emily
Landau, a senior research fellow and head of the Arms Control and Regional
Security Program at the Tel Aviv-based Institute for National Security
Studies.

In an Oct. 29 interview, Landau said extension or collapse are only two
options. As the deadline nears, there still is a chance for extracting a
good deal, she said.

“Now is the time to apply massive pressure. I hope at some point the
international community will wake up to the fact that Iran has absolutely no
interest in getting a good deal.”

But US officials are taking a wait-and-see approach. Speaking on Oct. 30,
Secretary of State John Kerry said that “whether Iran can make the tough
decisions that it needs to make will be determined in the next weeks. But I
have said consistently that no deal was better than a bad deal. And we’re
going to be very careful, very much based on expert advice, facts, science
as to the choices we make.”

Kerry added that the United States has “pledged that our goal is to shut off
each pathway [to an Iranian nuclear weapon] sufficient that we know we have
a break-out time of a minimum of a year that gives us the opportunity to
respond if they were to try to do that. We believe there are ways to achieve
that.”

Dennis Ross, a longtime US diplomat and senior State Department official who
led Washington’s negotiations with Iran under former US President George
H.W. Bush, has urged Western powers to resist the temptation to accede to
Tehran merely to close a deal.

In an Oct. 16 analysis published in Foreign Affairs, Ross suggested Iran was
using the negotiating framework as a springboard to roll back sanctions and
extract additional concessions.

“It’s no accident that hardly anyone involved in the Iranian nuclear
negotiations has expressed optimism about meeting the November 24 deadline,”
Ross wrote.

He cited a list of key positions that Western powers have already ceded to
Tehran in recent months. “P5+1 concessions allowed Iran to avoid suspending
uranium enrichment, despite UN Security Council resolutions mandated it to
do so.”

Other concessions included according Iran all privileges of signatory
countries of the Nuclear Non Proliferation Agreement, despite previous
violations. Western negotiators, he said, “accommodated Iranian insistence
on not dismantling centrifuges.”

In an Oct. 18 interview with Iran’s Fars news agency, Ali Younesi,
presidential adviser for religious affairs, reflected the position of
Iranian hardliners who are “not too keen” to close a deal.

According to a translation by the Middle East Media Research Institute,
Younesi said, “The Americans want this more than other countries. Some
ostensibly friendly countries, like Russia and China, do not want it to
yield results at all … [but] America does, because, if Obama fails to
achieve this, he will have no achievements whatsoever.”

Email: bopallrome@defensenews.com, amustafa@defensenews.com.

Search For An Article

....................................................................................................

Contact Us

POB 982 Kfar Sava
Tel 972-9-7604719
Fax 972-3-7255730
email:imra@netvision.net.il IMRA is now also on Twitter
http://twitter.com/IMRA_UPDATES

image004.jpg (8687 bytes)