About Us

IMRA
IMRA
IMRA

 

Subscribe

Search


...................................................................................................................................................


Monday, December 15, 2014
The Empire of David is a realistic historical phenomenon and the biblical description of its formation and consolidation is possible and reasonable -U. of Haifa Prof. Galil

The History of King David in Light of New Epigraphic and Archeological Data
Press Release - Media Relations University of Haifa
‏‏‏‏‏‏‏‏‏‏‏‏‏‏‏‏‏‏‏‏‏‏‏‏‏‏December 15, 2014‏‏‏‏‏‏‏‏‏‏‏‏‏‏‏‏‏‏‏
Kislev 23‏‎, 5775

The History of King David
in Light of New Epigraphic and Archeological Data

In two articles recently published in leading journals (Ugarit Forschungen
and Semitica), Prof. Gershon Galil of the University of Haifa (Department of
Biblical Studies) presented important information about the period of David’s
reign, based on new archaeological and epigraphic data unearthed in
northwestern Syria and southern Turkey.

Prof. Galil points out that King David halted the Arameans’ expansion into
the Land of Israel on account of his alliance with the southern Philistine
kings, as well as with Toi, king of Ḥamath, who is identified with Tai(ta)
II, king of Palistin (the northern Sea Peoples). "The Empire of David is a
realistic historical phenomenon and the biblical description of its
formation and consolidation is possible and reasonable," says Prof. Galil.
"It reflects the great struggle between the Arameans and the Sea Peoples for
the inheritance of the territories, which were previously part of the
Egyptian and the Hittite Empires. David took advantage of these conflicts to
unite the northern and the southern Sea Peoples against the mutual enemy,
Hadadezer king of Aram-Zobah. David defeated the Arameans and created a
regional empire from the Sinai Peninsula to the Euphrates."

“Eight inscriptions recently discovered at different sites clearly indicate
that a large kingdom named Palistin existed in northwestern Syria and
southern Turkey. It encompassed the cities Hamath, Aleppo and Carchemish,”
Prof. Galil says. “This kingdom was inhabited by different groups including
Sea Peoples. They invaded the Levant in the 12th century BC, conquered vast
areas, destroyed kingdoms and took over their lands.”

“The inscriptions of Ramesses III, king of Egypt (1182-1151 BC), indicate
that he conquered cities in northern Syria and seized control of “the lands
of Plst.” However, hitherto there was no evidence that Philistines had lived
in northern Syria, so scholars assumed that the Egyptian scribes
exaggerated, describing places which didn’t really exist,” Prof. Galil
explains. “The discovery of the northern kingdom of Palistin helps us
understand the Egyptian inscriptions and the reality of northwestern Syria
in those distant days.”

Prof. Galil adds that a few inscriptions form a direct link between the
archeological and epigraphic data unearthed in northern Palistin and the
Bible: Some open with the words “I am Tai(ta) the Hero, King of Palistin.”
Given our philological and historical knowledge, it’s clear that Tai(ta)
should be identified with Toi, mentioned in the Book of Samuel and in
Chronicles,” he says.

“The alliance between David and Toi, king of Hamath, against Hadadezer, king
of Zobah, is clearly attested in the Bible," says Prof. Galil, "We know for
sure now that Toi of Hamath existed, and that he was indeed a historical
figure. The biblical text in the Book of Samuel is therefore well supported
by the historical reality of the 10th century BC.” He stresses in particular
II Samuel 8:10: “When Toi, king of Hamath, heard that David had defeated the
entire army of Hadadezer, he sent his son Joram to King David, to greet him
and to congratulate him on defeating Hadadezer in battle --- for Hadadezer
had been at war with Toi”.

Prof. Galil thus proposes the following scenario. Relations between David
and the southern Philistines (particularly the people of Philistine Gath)
were close during David's reign in Hebron. But after the unification of
Israel and Judah, a war broke out between the Philistines and David, as
described in the Bible. At this stage the Arameans’ advance led by Hadadezer
king of Zobah, results in an alliance between David and Toi king of Hamath,
in the sense of “the enemy of my enemy is my friend.”

The alliance between David and the northern Philistines ultimately leads to
a pact with the southern Philistines as well, since they too were threatened
by the Arameans. With their joint forces, the Israelites and the Philistines
defeated the Arameans and seized their lands.

Prof. Galil notes that the close relationship between David and the
Philistines is also demonstrated by the fact that during Absalom’s
rebellion, all Israelites rebelled against David. Only a few people
supported him, primarily Philistine fighters: David’s royal garrison,
consisting mainly of Philistines known as "the Cherethites and the
Pelethites"; and Itai of Gath, who came to David’s aid from Philistine Gath
with 600 soldiers.

After his great victory over the Arameans, achieved with the help of his
allies, David established an empire from the Sinai Peninsula to the
Euphrates (see map).

Map: Israel, Zobah and Palistin in the 10th century BC.
http://bit.ly/1DARHRq

After the victory of David king of Israel, over the Arameans, David
controlled the entire area from the Sinai Peninsula to the Euphrates

Search For An Article

....................................................................................................

Contact Us

POB 982 Kfar Sava
Tel 972-9-7604719
Fax 972-3-7255730
email:imra@netvision.net.il IMRA is now also on Twitter
http://twitter.com/IMRA_UPDATES

image004.jpg (8687 bytes)