About Us

IMRA
IMRA
IMRA

 

Subscribe

Search


...................................................................................................................................................


Wednesday, July 19, 2017
Prof. Nino Levy on Negative Impact of US Defense Aid On Israel

Will we ever learn?
By Nino Levy, PhD, Professor of Systems Engineering

At first glance, the article “Poland to buy US Patriot system with
Israeli-made David's Sling missiles” by Udi Etzion, published on 09.07.17
(Ynet News) looks like excellent news for Israel, for its defense industry
and as a source of pride for the Israeli people.

In fact, it proves the disastrous effect of the long-standing addiction of
all Israeli administrations to the “generous American foreign military aid”.

Israel did not need American knowhow to develop “David’s Sling” or the Arrow
missile defense systems. The Israeli defense industry is perfectly competent
do this on its own, as demonstrated by the successful development of “Barak
8”, “Iron Dome” or the “Phalcon” AWACS system.

Instead of funding the development of David’s Sling” and “Arrow”, the
Israeli administrations prefer seeking American funding for “Joint
Development” of these systems “with American companies Like Raytheon,
Lockheed and others.
Since the development of complex systems in the US costs often 10 times more
than in Israel, it is a very relevant question whether the fraction of the
Israeli funding of the program is not more expensive than the cost of doing
the whole R&D work alone?

One thing is certain: the moment American funding is involved, the American
administration will always protect the interests of the American industries.
It will ban Israeli companies from offering jointly developed systems, that
may compete with American companies in the world markets.

In the case of Poland, the article states:
… “while David's Sling interceptor missiles will be included in the deal,
the missile defense system itself, as well as the Israel Aerospace
Industries' (IAI) Arrow system, were barred by Washington from bidding in
the Polish tender. The American administration, which funded the development
of both Israeli-made systems, did not approve their export to Warsaw”.

So, Rafael got a contract for one billion dollars and lost the opportunity
to sale the “David’s Sling” system for at least 4 billion. Could Rafael
compete successfully against Raytheon that won the contract for 7.6 billon
dollars? In a fair competition, the answer is definitely yes. Quote:
“Poland demanded the Israeli interceptor missile, which was developed with
Raytheon and is marketed in the world under the name "SkyCeptor," because of
its better performance compared to the American Patriot interceptor and its
considerably lower price, which stands at only 10 percent of the price of
the American counterpart—$450,000 compared to $4.5 million”.

The other two major sub-systems of “David’s Sling”; the Radar and the
Command and Control Center are as good or better than Raytheon’s and
certainly less expensive.

The case of the lost opportunity in Poland is just one of many cases of
opportunities, worth tenths of billions of dollars, lost because of our
addiction to American Military Aid. Depending on it might have been
necessary in the 1980’s with the state of Israeli economy at that time. It’s
not economically justified today.
In the 1980’s American administration supported the joint funding of the
“Lavi” fighter aircraft until it became apparent that the “Lavi” may become
a serious competitor to “Lockheed”.

Similarly, the American administration did not object to the sale of the
“Phalcon” AWACS system to China, until it became apparent that it may become
a serious competitor to “Boeing”. In that case, no American funding was
involved.

However, the American administration objected the transfer of American
technology to China.

Being intimately involved with the development of the “Phalcon”, I am sure
that no proprietary American technology was used in this program. What is
certain is that Israel lost the opportunity to sale number of such systems
to China, valued at billions of dollars.

We should have learned by now that the American administration will always
take care of the interest of the American industries, and rightly so.

The question is when the Israeli administration will learn to take care of
the long-term interests of the Israeli industries?

I don’t think that our administration is full of the “penny wise- dollar
stupid” types. Most people probably see and some even understand the picture
described above. However, there are strong political obstacles that no
administration dares to challenge.

First, adding close to one billion dollars to the defense annual budget for
the development of advanced weapon systems can hardly be accepted by the
prevalent public opinion demanding to restrain defense expenditures.

Using American Foreign Aid money works like opium drugs to calm the public
and prevent painful debates about the need to rationalize the defense
expenses. Politicians prefer short term populistic attitudes rather than
engagement in a tough campaign to defend the long term economic benefits of
independence in this strategic field.

Second, politicians shy from the possibility of offending our American
friends by competing with the American industry. No one doubts the
importance of keeping strong friendly relations with the US. The question is
why England, France and Germany can have strong friendly relations with the
US and at the same time have no restrains in competing with US firms?

The answer is our dependence on the American Aid opium. Detoxification is a
painful but necessary process to cure the body from the effects of the
addiction. The process needs to be gradual to avoid the shock of an abrupt
interruption. But it must be defined within a reasonable time frame and
leading to the firm objective of zero foreign military aid.

Our economy can afford the detoxification even today. The American Military
Aid Israel gets is widely known to be the highest any country receives from
the American tax payer. But it amounts to less than 2% of our GDP. With
determination and good will it can be absorbed within our budget.

The sooner we step down from the back of the American tax payer, the better
our image in the American public opinion. This will be an important step to
strengthen our independence and gain the respect of friends and enemies
abroad.
It might be disturbing to some American politicians to lose a most
convincing argument about their support to Israel, but they will have ample
opportunity to demonstrate their friendship to Israel in other fields, and
we shall always be grateful for their support.

Search For An Article

....................................................................................................

Contact Us

POB 982 Kfar Sava
Tel 972-9-7604719
Fax 972-3-7255730
email:imra@netvision.net.il IMRA is now also on Twitter
http://twitter.com/IMRA_UPDATES

image004.jpg (8687 bytes)