About Us

IMRA
IMRA
IMRA

 

Subscribe

Search


...................................................................................................................................................


Sunday, October 1, 2017
IMRA Interview: Likud MK Anat Berko Pitches Dividing Jerusalem Before Completing Study of Consequences

IMRA Interview: Likud MK Anat Berko Pitches Dividing Jerusalem Before
Completing Study of Consequences
Dr. Aaron Lerner 1 October 2017

The following is a translation of the Hebrew exchange via WhatsApp

Lerner: Photo of Ben Caspit column in Maariv on 29 September with the
headline: "Separation Plan - KM Dr. Anat Berko presented a comprehensive
plan this week to the Prime Minister, whose goal is to separate between the
Arabs and Jews in Jerusalem..."

Good morning from Dr. Aaron Lerner - a member of the Likud Central committee
in Raanana. I wanted to clarify if in fact in your plan neighborhoods are
transferred to the Palestinian Authority. I wanted to also ask on behalf of
www.imra.org.il.

Likud MK Dr. Ana Berko: Good morning Dr. Lerner, read the article carefully,
I would be pleased if you invited me to talk about the plan.

Lerner: I want to do my "homework", so there is a basic point:

There are plans to transfer neighborhoods in Jerusalem to a separate Israeli
regional council.

From what I understand, from what Ben Caspit wrote, according to your plan
we are not talking about transferring neighborhoods to a separate Israeli
regional council but instead to the Palestinian Authority. Is this correct?

Berko: To remove a mass of villages that have nothing to do with Jerusalem
and today they have the status of residents (National Insurance, health
insurance), that they exploit for terror in certain circumstances. Only
security considerations will be made.

Lerner: That is to say - yes, transferring them to the Palestinian
Authority.

Only one question: was a simulation carried out of the implementation of
your plan by a "red team"?

That is to say: taking a staff that thinks how they could exploit the
program.

I ask this in particular since you relate to "security considerations" and
it may turn out that a "red team" analysis finds ways to exploit the
implementation of the plan to an extent that the plan is already
problematic.

In contrast: if the plan holds up even when one tries to exploit it this
would add to the plan.

By the way: the idea of red team analysis is from Shlomo Gazit [AL: former
head of Military Intelligence]. He maintains that in his time this tool was
used and that we screw up many times now because we don't really think to
the end what the enemy can do.

I will translate the answer to English for distribution in www.imra.org.il.

Berko: I don't know what a red team is. They weren't in the story.

Lerner: Here is a report of the US Joint Chiefs of Staff describing the
need for red teams: http://fas.org/irp/doddir/dod/jdn1_16.pdf
[AL: Joint Doctrine Note 1-16 Command Red Team 16 May 2016 Unclassified]

It is a way to examine ideas and plans.

Berko: We haven't used this, at this stage. In any case, thanks for the
update. I am going into a Knesset Committee.

Lerner: I (Aaron Lerner) am in shock.

You are going around with a plan. Sending it even to the Prime Minister and
of course the media

And it turns out that the depth of thinking invested in the security
considerations can be measured as a few millimeters!!

Berko: You are wrong. The matters were weighed and studied by a serious and
trained staff. We can discuss this later. Have a good day.

Lerner: If how a team of the enemy can exploit the plan isn't checked then
one is left with a situation of "best case analysis".

By the way, that's why in the IDF they claimed that it was possible to leave
the Golan.

They thought about it and studied how everything would be ok with various
substitutes.

But they weren't willing to really study it.

Berko: Don't worry, these things will be studied. It is clear that no one
relies on the Palestinians in any case!

Lerner: You write "will be studied" and not "were studied". That's to say,
you gave a plan to our Prime Minister and the media before a proper in depth
study.

In all due respect, we in Israel have suffered enough from plans that
weren't subject to appropriate study before they were published.

You are not from a think tank. You are a Likud Member of Knesset. A Member
of Knesset because you were chosen by the Prime Minister [AL: she did not run
in the primaries but instead was picked by PM Netanyahu for the list].

When the world sees the plan - including the Trump staff - they relate to it
accordingly.

I recommend that in light of the importance that is given to your plan that
you take a break to recruit an appropriate group that can do a simulation of
the results of the plan, with the people playing the Arabs being the most
innovative and smart - and act under the basic assumptions that their goal
is to cause the maximum damage to Israel.

Best regards,
Dr. Aaron Lerner

Berko: The work hasn't been completed Dr. Lerner.

Lerner: But its already getting media publicity. And you already gave
material to the Prime Minister.

It would be appropriate to publish an announcement that you are taking a
break to check the plan and that until the checking has been completed you
do not support the plan.

[No reply].
________________________________________
IMRA - Independent Media Review and Analysis

Since 1992 providing news and analysis on the Middle East with a focus on
Arab-Israeli relations

Website: www.imra.org.il

Search For An Article
....................................................................................................

Contact Us

POB 982 Kfar Sava
Tel 972-9-7604719
Fax 972-3-7255730
email:imra@netvision.net.il IMRA is now also on Twitter
http://twitter.com/IMRA_UPDATES

image004.jpg (8687 bytes)